AI Observatory
Safety and Policy Guardrails
AI support should be useful while avoiding unsafe root promises, billing confusion, privacy leaks, and unsupported compatibility claims.
Public surface
Safety and Policy Guardrails
Safety rules keep AI aligned with CRYA policy, Play readiness, and user trust. Risky device, root, billing, and account topics need careful routing.
No universal claims for QMG, system paths, root modules, or firmware behavior.
Premium, clean exports, and paid packs stay separate and privately verified.
No passwords, purchase tokens, private links, or account data in public answers.
High-risk issues move to docs, support, or admin review.
| Sensitive topics | Root/system changes, refunds, account deletion, moderation, private data, and legal/policy questions. |
|---|---|
| Answer style | Calm, evidence-first, no panic, no overclaiming, and clear next steps. |
| Play readiness | AI must not encourage permission misuse, deceptive billing, or unsafe device actions. |
| Audit | Safety rules, prompts, and rejected answers should be reviewable by admin users. |
Workflow
How this should work
A public page should explain the user path while protected state, permissions, and audit trails stay in CRYA Mission Control.
Detect device/root, billing, privacy, or policy-sensitive request.
Answer with limits and evidence requirements.
Route private/high-risk cases.
Improve docs after reviewed outcomes.
Related surfaces
Continue the journey
Move between public discovery, creator guidance, store trust, and support evidence without exposing private admin systems.